Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Core i5-6400
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $57.43 vs $224.00
- Up to 72% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-10700F - $0.26 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-6400 - 240 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
223
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.43
390%
Value Winner
Buy for $57.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
Buy for $224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6400 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |