In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-560M is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2673 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-560M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 35 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6 – 68 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Sep 08, 2014 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-560M vs Xeon E5-2673 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-560M vs Xeon E5-2673 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-560M vs Xeon E5-2673 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-560M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2673 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-560M Sep 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2673 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Released | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
