In Deathloop, the Core i5-560M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 7900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-560M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 3 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 12 years and 3 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-560M vs Ryzen 9 7900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$401
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-560M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-560M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-560M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-560M Sep 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $429.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
