In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-540M is slightly faster than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-540M
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 246 vs 243 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Is 3 months and 29 days newer – Jan 07, 2010 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 3 months and 29 days newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-540M vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-540M vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-540M vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-540M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.073 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-540M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $241.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
