The Core i5-540M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the EPYC 7502. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7502
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 4 threads
Core i5-540M vs EPYC 7502
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-540M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
186
93%
Min 1% FPS
131
94%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-540M vs EPYC 7502 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-540M vs EPYC 7502 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-540M vs EPYC 7502 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-540M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.073 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
EPYC 7502
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-540M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7502 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Rome |
35 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
