In Rust, the Core i5-540M is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 34% faster in Rust – 280 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Rust
- Is 15 years and 6 days newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 15 years and 6 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-540M vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
280 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-540M vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-540M vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-540M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.073 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-540M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
