In Atomfall, the Core i5-540M is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 221 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-540M vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-540M vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-540M vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-540M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.073 GHz
58%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-540M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $509.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
