The Core i5-5287U is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-4590T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-5287U
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 28 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4590T
The Core i5-5287U is better in every way
Core i5-5287U vs Core i5-4590T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-5287U
Mar 1st, 2015
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
138
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
196
99%
Min 1% FPS
137
99%
Price, $
$45.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i5-5287U vs Core i5-4590T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5287U vs Core i5-4590T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5287U vs Core i5-4590T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5287U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-5287U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4590T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
| $315.00 | MSRP | $192.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Haswell |
28 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| Intel Iris 6100 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
