In Atomfall, the Core i5-5200U is slightly faster than the Xeon X3440. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 195 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3440
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs Xeon X3440: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs Xeon X3440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs Xeon X3440 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon X3440
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3440 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $215.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1156 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
