In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-5200U is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
99%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
