In Atomfall, the Core i5-5200U is slightly faster than the FX-9370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 196 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 15 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 93% less energy
FX-9370
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs FX-9370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM3+ |
15 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
