In Atomfall, the Core i5-5200U is slightly faster than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 195 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-8320
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
97%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM3+ |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
