In Atomfall, the Core i5-5200U is slightly faster than the FX-4350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 196 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-4350
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
190 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
97%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM3+ |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
