In Atomfall, the Core i5-5200U is slightly faster than the Core i5-3320M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 194 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 15 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i5-3320M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs Core i5-3320M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
97%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs Core i5-3320M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs Core i5-3320M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | unknown |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
