In Counter-Strike 2, the Core i5-5200U is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 15 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 48% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 384 vs 260 FPS
- Up to 48% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
384 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
230 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
