In Rust, the Core i5-5200U is slightly faster than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-5200U
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 211 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 15 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
Celeron G1610
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-5200U vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
93%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-5200U vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-5200U vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-5200U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-5200U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1155 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 5500 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
