In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-480M is slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-480M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 27% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 119 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-480M vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
119 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
100%
Price, $
$224.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-480M vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-480M vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-480M
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-480M Jan 9th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
