In Deathloop, the Core i5-4690K is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4690K
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 88 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 30% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop – 247 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2014
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-4690K vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$519.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4690K vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4690K vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4690K Jun 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$243.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
88 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
