The Core i5-4690K is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-8100 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's $11.79 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-4690K
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 11% cheaper – $93.90 vs $105.69
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 65 vs 88 Watts
Core i5-4690K vs Core i3-8100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, $
$93.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
183
99%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, $
$105.69
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
89%
Core i5-4690K vs Core i3-8100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4690K vs Core i3-8100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4690K vs Core i3-8100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4690K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| $243.00 | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 88 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
