In Atomfall, the Core i5-4690 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $468 cheaper!
Core i5-4690
- Up to 84% cheaper – $92.02 vs $560.00
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Atomfall – $0.45 vs $2.25/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 16, 2025 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 65 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4690 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4690
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
204 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
82%
Price, $
$92.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$560
16%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4690 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4690 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4690
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 16th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4690 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 16th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 16th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
