In Rust, the Core i5-4670T is slightly faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 216 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
45W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
