In Deathloop, the Core i5-4670T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 28, 2025 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 28th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 28th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
