In Atomfall, the Core i5-4670T is slightly slower than the Core i9-9940X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 45 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9940X
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-9940X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1288.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-9940X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-9940X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9940X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,387.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2066 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
