In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-4670T is slightly faster than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 182 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
93%
Price, $
$529.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
