In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-4670T is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i9-13900
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
