In Atomfall, the Core i5-4670T is slower than the Core i7-13700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700KF
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Core i7-13700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$582.72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i7-13700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i7-13700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
