In Atomfall, the Core i5-4670T is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 45 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
