In Atomfall, the Core i5-4670T is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670T vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670T vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
