In Atomfall, the Core i5-4670 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $208 cheaper!
Core i5-4670
- Up to 60% cheaper – $140.00 vs $347.55
- Up to 60% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $1.41/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 65 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670 vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
203 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
83%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$347.55
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
48%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 84 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
