In Atomfall, the Core i5-4670 is slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $307 cheaper!
Core i5-4670
- Up to 69% cheaper – $140.00 vs $447.16
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $1.80/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 84 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4670 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
204 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
82%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
31%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
38%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4670 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
84 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
