The Core i5-4670 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105T, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $60.06 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-4670
- Up to 67% cheaper – $29.93 vs $89.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i3-10105T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i5-4670 vs Core i3-10105T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
182
99%
Min 1% FPS
121
99%
Price, $
$29.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, $
$89.99
33%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
33%
Core i5-4670 vs Core i3-10105T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4670 vs Core i3-10105T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4670 vs Core i3-10105T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4670 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
84 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |