In Rust, the Core i5-4590T is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $116 cheaper!
Core i5-4590T
- Up to 47% cheaper – $129.94 vs $246.04
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Rust – $0.60 vs $1.05/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 233 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs May 11, 2014
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-4590T vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
215 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
80%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
233 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.04
52%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4590T May 11th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 11th, 2014 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$192.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
