In Atomfall, the Core i5-4590T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $251 cheaper!
Core i5-4590T
- Up to 66% cheaper – $129.94 vs $380.99
- Up to 66% cheaper
- Up to 63% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $1.74/FPS
- Up to 63% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 11, 2014
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4590T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
198 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
90%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
34%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
37%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4590T May 11th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 11th, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
