The Core i5-4590T is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4690 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $34.89 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-4590T
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4690
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 27% cheaper – $95.05 vs $129.94
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i5-4590T vs Core i5-4690 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
196
98%
Min 1% FPS
137
98%
Price, $
$129.94
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
71%
Core i5-4690
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$95.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Core i5-4590T vs Core i5-4690 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i5-4690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i5-4690 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i5-4690
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4590T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
$192.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
35 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |