In Atomfall, the Core i5-4590T is slightly slower than the Core i3-6100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $64 more expensive!
Core i5-4590T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i3-6100
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 202 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs May 11, 2014
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Up to 48% cheaper – $70.65 vs $135.03
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall – $0.34 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
197 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
97%
Price, $
$135.03
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
50%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4590T May 11th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 11th, 2014 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
