In Atomfall, the Core i5-4590T is slightly slower than the Core i3-4130 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $94 more expensive!
Core i5-4590T
- Is 8 months and 8 days newer – May 11, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 months and 8 days newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 199 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 70% cheaper – $41.00 vs $135.03
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
197 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
99%
Price, $
$135.03
30%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
29%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4590T May 11th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 11th, 2014 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
