In Atomfall, the Core i5-4590T is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $31 more expensive!
Core i5-4590T
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 198 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – May 11, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 24% cheaper – $98.95 vs $129.94
- Up to 24% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall – $0.54 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
83%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
183 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
93%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590T
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4590T May 11th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 11th, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
