The Core i5-4590 is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-7400T and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $23.26 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-4590
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 36% cheaper – $41.30 vs $64.56
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
Core i5-4590 vs Core i5-7400T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4590
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
200
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$41.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
198
99%
Min 1% FPS
138
99%
Price, $
$64.56
63%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
62%
Core i5-4590 vs Core i5-7400T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4590 vs Core i5-7400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4590 vs Core i5-7400T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4590
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4590 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
84 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |