In Atomfall, the Core i5-4570T is slightly slower than the Core i7-4790T and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $0 more expensive!
Core i5-4570T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-4790T
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 months and 28 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 10 months and 28 days newer
- Up to 0% cheaper – $149.88 vs $149.94
- Up to 0% cheaper
- Up to 1% better value in Atomfall – $0.73 vs $0.74/FPS
- Up to 1% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570T vs Core i7-4790T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
97%
Price, $
$149.94
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
99%
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i7-4790T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i7-4790T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4790T May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
