In Rust, the Core i5-4570T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $30 more expensive!
Core i5-4570T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 226 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 20% cheaper – $119.99 vs $149.94
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Rust – $0.53 vs $0.69/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570T vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
216 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
87%
Price, $
$149.94
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
77%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
