In Atomfall, the Core i5-4570T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $11 more expensive!
Core i5-4570T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-9400
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 7% cheaper – $139.00 vs $149.94
- Up to 7% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Atomfall – $0.66 vs $0.74/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570T vs Core i5-9400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
201 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
95%
Price, $
$149.94
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
89%
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i5-9400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i5-9400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400 Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
