In Deathloop, the Core i5-4570T is slightly slower than the Core i3-550 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Core i5-4570T
- Is 3 years and 3 days newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 3 years and 3 days newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i3-550
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 13% cheaper – $129.94 vs $149.94
- Up to 13% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in Deathloop – $0.58 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$149.94
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
85%
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-550
May 30th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-550 May 30th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | May 30th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $138.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
