In Deathloop, the Core i5-4570T is slightly slower than the Core i3-540 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $47 more expensive!
Core i5-4570T
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i3-540
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 32% cheaper – $102.56 vs $149.94
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 34% better value in Deathloop – $0.45 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 34% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-540: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
97%
Price, $
$149.94
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
66%
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-540 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-540 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-540 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $133.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
