In Deathloop, the Core i5-4570T is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Core i5-4570T
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 34% cheaper – $98.95 vs $149.94
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Deathloop – $0.43 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
96%
Price, $
$149.94
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
63%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
