In Atomfall, the Core i5-4570T is slightly slower than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's the same price!
Core i5-4570T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 5% better value in Atomfall – $0.71 vs $0.75/FPS
- Up to 5% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
95%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
95%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570T vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
