In Deathloop, the Core i5-4570 is slightly slower than the FX-8300. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $20 cheaper!
Core i5-4570
- Is 7 months and 8 days newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 7 months and 8 days newer
- Up to 19% cheaper – $85.96 vs $106.06
- Up to 19% cheaper
- Up to 19% better value in Deathloop – $0.39 vs $0.48/FPS
- Up to 19% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 84 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 12% less energy
FX-8300
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-4570 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-4570
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$85.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
81%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4570 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4570 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4570
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4570 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
84W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
