In Deathloop, the Core i5-4460T is slightly slower than the Xeon W3550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4460T
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Mar 01, 2014 vs Aug 09, 2009
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3550
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-4460T vs Xeon W3550: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4460T vs Xeon W3550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4460T vs Xeon W3550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4460T
Mar 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon W3550
Aug 9th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4460T Mar 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3550 Aug 9th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 9th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
