In Atomfall, the Core i5-4460T is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4460T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Mar 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4460T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4460T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4460T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4460T
Mar 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4460T Mar 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | SP3r2 |
35W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
