In Atomfall, the Core i5-4460T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4460T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Mar 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-4460T vs Core i5-9600KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4460T vs Core i5-9600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4460T vs Core i5-9600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4460T
Mar 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4460T Mar 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
