In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-4460T is slower than the Core i5-11400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-4460T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11400F
- Up to 26% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 137 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 7 years and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 01, 2014
- Is 7 years and 15 days newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-4460T vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
137 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$203.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4460T vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4460T vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4460T
Mar 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-4460T Mar 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
